Researchers

From dozens of papers to a review framework you can verify

Import papers and lectures in bulk. AI organizes the ideas by research question, method and finding. Every claim traces back to its source, and new papers fold in as you go.

1

Import papers

Bring in papers as PDFs, lecture videos and web pages.

Files0Add content
  • SurveyPDF32 pagesProcessing
  • ProbingPDF14 pagesProcessing
  • RetrievalPDF18 pagesProcessing
  • LLM talkYouTube52 min · transcribedProcessing
  • BenchmarksWeb pageText extractedProcessing
2

Read closely, annotate, take notes

Bilingual side by side; turn text into a plain version; highlight and annotate; drag passages onto a whiteboard as card notes.

Survey
Side by side

大语言模型幻觉检测:综述

Detecting Hallucinations in Large Language Models: A Survey

3.1 基于一致性的检测
3.1 Consistency-based detection

对同一问题多次采样时,若答案相互矛盾,往往说明模型在编造。

When a model is sampled several times on the same question, contradictory answers often indicate fabrication.

这类方法无需访问模型内部,但每次查询都要多次调用模型。

These methods need no access to model internals, but they require multiple calls per query.

3.2 探测内部状态
3.2 Probing internal states

在隐藏层激活上训练的探针,能在答案生成之前识别出多数幻觉。

Probes trained on hidden activations can flag many hallucinations before the answer is generated.

  • Survey
  • Probing
  • Retrieval
  • LLM talk
  • Benchmarks

3.1 Consistency-based detection

Most methods rest on one observation: contradictory answers across samples often mean the model is fabricating. These methods need no access to model internals.

The catch is cost: each query needs several calls.

12 / 32
Whiteboard
Research questions
Detection methods
Drag to the whiteboard to make a card
Self-consistency

contradictory answers across samples often mean the model is fabricating

Surveyp.12
3

AI organizes across papers

By question, method, finding and debate, into a review whiteboard. Every claim leads back to its source.

5 papers

Organize these 5 papers by question, method, finding and debate, with sources.

Organizing 5 papers
WhiteboardHallucination detection review
Questions

Can we catch them from outside the model?

Surveyp.3

Can we flag them before the answer?

Probingp.2
Methods

Self-consistency: sample, then compare

Surveyp.12

Probes on hidden activations

Probingp.5
Findings

Retrieval helps, but does not fix it

Retrievalp.9

Bigger models hallucinate less

Benchmarks§2
Debates

Is a consistent answer a correct one?

LLM talk38:05Surveyp.18
Benchmarks

On the same QA benchmarks, larger models hallucinate less: from 7B to 70B, the rate drops by half.

§2
4

Keep iterating

Add new papers and let AI build them onto what you have. Every change waits for your approval.

3 new papers

Fold the 3 new papers into the review and flag where they disagree with what we have

Folding in 3 new papers
WhiteboardHallucination detection reviewPending review2 added1 edited1 deleted
Questions

Can we catch them from outside the model?

Surveyp.3

Can we flag them before the answer?

Probingp.2
Methods

Self-consistency: sample, then compare

Surveyp.12

Probes on hidden activations

Probingp.5
Added

Probes work across languages too

Multilingual probingp.4
Findings
Edited

Retrieval helps, but does not fix it

Retrieval helps, but less on long texts

Retrievalp.9Retrieval revisitedp.3
Deleted

Bigger models hallucinate less

Benchmarks§2
Debates

Is a consistent answer a correct one?

LLM talk38:05Surveyp.18
Added

Self-consistency may fail on long texts

Long-context testp.6

Accelerate your research